Features  

The projects inception was very much about an `exchange' and co operation, therefore the 

understanding of the way in which users are to use the resource was clear from start 

It has a strong peer review process requires the involvement of two kinds of reviewers: instructional 

design experts and subject matter experts.  

The project has 26 universities listed as project partners 

Each partner has two directors responsible for the development of CLOE development 

Users must complete a object deposit form for each resource uploaded 

Users must complete a object download form for each resource taken 

A structured peer review process 

No mention of an editing tool 

Compliancy to standards is unclear 

It is unclear what the `learnwise' objects are, in terms of size. 

openness (unable to find information at time of writing) 

No digital rights 

Requires stand alone client for access 

Built using Zope 

No Interoperability Standards and Specifications supported 

versioning (unable to find information at time of writing) 

RSS (unable to find information at time of writing) 

Contributors produce the metadata 

Controlled vocabulary used for classifications 

metadata specification (unable to find information at time of writing) 

Page 29 of 84